Friday, November 21, 2014

Sound and Fury

While watching the documentary Sound and Fury, I was often times left feeling frustrated and angered by some of the situations and arguments that took place.  With the filmmaker’s stylistic choices for this documentary, it made it much easier to comprehend and follow.  The viewer is able to hear each argument and opinion of the individuals more clearly, because he or she is interviewed separately.  This cleared up any confusion and gave each character a say in the matter.  I also enjoyed the voiceover.  The filmmaker could have easily used subtitles, but it flows much more smoothly with verbal communication.  The voiceovers were very enthusiastic and personalized to each character. 

I find it interesting that at the beginning of the film, Peter and Nita were leaning towards the implant, but as time progressed, their opinion took a complete 180.  Nita starts out saying, “I want Heather to have the best of both worlds: to speak and to sign,” and “More options would be available to her if she were able to hear.  Life would be easier.”  However, after she finds out that it wouldn’t be in her own best interest to get a cochlear implant, her opinion, along with her husband’s, begins to change.  At the family gathering, Peter and his mother go at it.  I was left feeling a bit overwhelmed.  She argues the exact opposite.  “She will suffer more.”  “The deaf world is changing.”  “It’s not just a gamble.”  All of these statements provided by the grandmother cause conflict among the different Discourses.
The main Discourses are the connections among hearing people opposed to the connections among deaf people.  It is Deaf Culture that seems to be the most prevalent.  I always viewed deafness as a disability, but after watching this film, I realized that those who are deaf do not see it that way.  It is not a handicap, and they are proud to be who they were meant to be.  However, Mary, Peter’s sister-in-law, is very frustrated by this Discourse.  She was the only hearing person of her family and simply couldn’t stand it.  As a child she rebelled and refused to sign.  I found this Discourse among her family members to be very intriguing. 

Personally, I was extremely frustrated with the way Heather’s parents threw out and neglected the implantation of the cochlear.  Maybe it’s hard for me to understand because I am a hearing person, but I think that children like Heather would be provided with greater opportunities and could encompass even greater potential if they could hear.  Because I am a twin, I agree strongly with the choice made by Chris and Mari for their son.  I can’t even fathom how hard it would be if Lydia were hearing and I were deaf.  Being at home, being out with friends, going to school, going to work, and etc. would be extremely trying and difficult.  I would constantly feel one step behind and not as good as Lydia.  Just because one can be implanted with a cochlear, doesn’t mean that they have to neglect his or her Deaf Culture. 
It would be interesting to see how the cochlear in baby Peter has affected the family dynamic.  Are there any regrets among Mary and Chris or Peter and Nita in regards the decisions they made?