Wednesday, July 9, 2014

"Women are equal, just different"

Fuller and Steinem are two very different authors from two very different times, but they have one very similar viewpoint when it comes to the reality in which women are treated and how they should justly be treated.  Reading from line to line and from article to article, I was able to recognize that women truly are oppressed.  This was something I thought only happened in many of the eastern countries.  However, it does happen here in the United States, too.  Although it may not be as visible, distinct, and harsh, it occurs more often than one would think.  Centuries and centuries ago, women were treated far differently from men, but overtime, the gap has slowly grown closer together.  This is why it is hard for many to recognize and admit that oppression does still exist.  Like Steinem stated, "logic has nothing to do with oppression."  It exists because of how surrounding influences treat it.  In a way, it is "learned."  If one grows up thinking it is okay to treat women unfairly, he or she has known nothing else, so it is viewed as okay behavior.

Although this may be an extreme (since it was written back in the 1800's), the statement regarding how "a tone of feeling towards women as towards slaves" exists, it does have some truth behind it.  Discrimination is discrimination, no matter the severity; people are people and should be treated as such.  Fuller's writing was a bit difficult to comprehend, but I was easily able to grasp the meaning for why she wrote it.  Her goal was to show the reader that "there is but one law for all souls, and, if there is to be an interpreter of it, he comes not as man, or son of man, but as Son of God."  All are equal - men and women.  

As I read through Steinem's piece, I actually "LOLed."  I loved how she captivated my attention right from the beginning.  She was able to transform a very serious topic into something that was very relate-able. Steinem has a certain power that allows her to write what could be considered a "questionable" paper and still get her point across.  From the true vulnerability of a man to all of the hilarious analogies, Steinem communicated to the reader that women have to say, "no" to the unequal treatment from men.  Steinem easily relates to Fuller when it comes to the idea that "women are equal, just different."  Women need to stop bickering with one another and realize where the true heart of the problem is.  After all, "the power of justifications would go on and on.  If we let them."      

3 comments:

  1. Hey Chloe! I hope your summer is going well! I have to say, I really enjoyed reading your blog because you took what the authors wrote about in their blogs and solidified what they were trying to get across. The bottom line is, women are being oppressed and people have to start realizing that. I have to agree with you when you say that oppression happens just as much in the United States than as it would somewhere else. Like you said, "it may not be as visible, distinct, or harsh, but it still occurs." I also found myself chuckling during Steinem's essay because she was able to take a serious topic and turn it into something that everyone could relate too. In the end, women have to stick up for themselves, no matter how small the circumstance may be, because that will finally put an end to the oppression.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Chloe! Nice work being on top of the blogging this summer. I liked this post a lot. You got a sense of what the two authors were attempting to convey, and I like that you used quotes from the essay to support your observations. Keep it up, and I'll see you next month.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, Chloe! Nice work on your blogging. I agree that the quote, "Logic has nothing to do with oppression," is one of the more important lines out of the two essays. Throughout reading the essays and blogging about the two pieces that quote stuck with me. There is no logic in the area of oppression, humans are humans, they always have been, and always will be. I also found Fuller's essay difficult to follow sentence for sentence, but the message rang clear. Her goal to get the particular message of, "there is but one law for all souls, and, if there is to be an interpreter of it, he comes not as man, or son of man, but as Son of God," was easily met. Steinem's essay had a theme and message that I hadn't seen before, but I fully enjoyed the essay none the less. Have a nice end to the Summer!

    ReplyDelete