Transcendentalism eludes to a very complex definition which includes many factors and qualifications, but in simple terms, I believe it means that one is independent from society and does as he or she pleases. It doesn't necessarily mean that they are rebelling in a negative way, but rather that they have become self-reliant and intuitive to their own needs and desires. As far as strengths and weaknesses go regarding transcendentalism, I think it depends on the opinion of those classifying it; it's all in the eye of the beholder. Some may view it as a force of unnecessary rebellion. A strength however, would be that an individual is going after what he or she wants versus simply sitting back and enjoying the ride. They are not following those around them, but rather taking a chance and going after what he or she desires.
I agree with the fact that transcendentalists are go-getters. It's nice to see that people go after what they want even if it defies any sort of social norm. However, this could transform into something I would disagree with depending on the severity of the action one chooses to act upon. Some situations may become too intense, and I would not feel comfortable participating. Sometimes it's okay to just sit back and go with the flow depending on your beliefs surrounding the situation.
Personally, I do not view myself as much of a transcendentalist. When it comes to my own opinions and desires, I am not exactly extremely vocal or authoritative about them. I try to weigh both the advantages and disadvantages of a situation before taking action. It is important to me that I understand the consequences of my actions before I act. I always stand up for myself and try to lead by example, but that doesn't necessarily mean that I take all matters into my own hands. I take into account how other people feel about an idea or how they may react to a situation before I jump right in.
No comments:
Post a Comment